1 files changed, 0 insertions, 74 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/org.eclipse.wst.validation/validate_core/org/eclipse/wst/validation/internal/provisional/core/IValidator.java b/plugins/org.eclipse.wst.validation/validate_core/org/eclipse/wst/validation/internal/provisional/core/IValidator.java
deleted file mode 100644
index 6fbd55e7f..000000000
--- a/plugins/org.eclipse.wst.validation/validate_core/org/eclipse/wst/validation/internal/provisional/core/IValidator.java
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,74 +0,0 @@
-/*******************************************************************************
- * Copyright (c) 2001, 2007 IBM Corporation and others.
- * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
- * are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
- * which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
- * http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html
- *
- * Contributors:
- * IBM Corporation - initial API and implementation
- *******************************************************************************/
-package org.eclipse.wst.validation.internal.provisional.core;
-
-import org.eclipse.wst.validation.internal.core.ValidationException;
-
-/**
- * This is the base interface for all Validators. A Validator is a class which verifies that objects
- * follow some rules. For example, in a MOF model which represents an EJB jar, the EJB specification
- * determines the rules. 
- * <p>
- * A validator can perform full validation or incremental validation. All validators must implement
- * full validation but incremental validation is optional.
- * </p>
- * <p>
- * Each validator must not be tied to any particular workbench implementation.
- * </p>
- * <p>
- * A validator's verification starts when the ValidatorLauncher singleton calls
- * <code>validate</code>.
- * </p>
- * <p>
- * <b>Provisional API:</b> This class/interface is part of an interim API that is still under development and expected to 
- * change significantly before reaching stability. It is being made available at this early stage to solicit feedback 
- * from pioneering adopters on the understanding that any code that uses this API will almost certainly be broken 
- * (repeatedly) as the API evolves.
- * </p>
- */
-public interface IValidator{
-	
-	/*
-	 * [issue : CS - Perhaps the IValidator should be required to provide a 'name' that can be used describe 
-	 * the running validation 'Job'.  Then the framework could automatically say something like 'XYZ validator : cleanup'.
-	 * Relying on the IValidator to provide subtask information seems error prone.]
-	 * [issue: LM - Is the cleanup method necessary? Can the framework put a requirement that client validators 'clean up'
-	 *  before returning from the validate method? ] 
-	 */
-	
-	/**
-	 * Perform any resource cleanup once validation is complete. If cleanup will take some time, the
-	 * IValidator should report subtask information to the user through the IReporter parameter. The
-	 * IReporter parameter will not be null.
-	 * 
-	 * @param reporter Used for the interaction with the user.
-	 */
-	void cleanup(IReporter reporter);
-
-	/*
-	 * [issue : CS - I'm curious to understand why the validator is not invoked directly on a file.  It seems it should be the
-	 * domain of another API to manage manage incremental file changes and triggering validations accordingly. 
-	 * Do we have a current use case in WTP where the validator does anything more validate a file from the changedFiles list?]
-	 */
-	/**
-	 * This is the method which performs the validation on the objects.
-	 * <p>
-	 * <code>helper</code> and <code>reporter</code> may not be null. <code>changedFiles</code>
-	 * may be null, if a full build is desired. <br>
-	 * </p>
-	 * @param helper 
-	 * 			Loads an object. 
-	 * @param reporter
-	 * 			Is an instance of an IReporter interface, which is used for interaction with the user.
-	 * 
-	 */
-	void validate(IValidationContext helper, IReporter reporter) throws ValidationException;
-}