blob: afa15f578bcb3bfe1e07f69f748dc0e278696b8d [file] [log] [blame]
<!DOCTYPE html
PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "../xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../css/ot.css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../css/otjld.css" />
<title>OT/J Language Definition v1.3</title>
</head>
<body class="otdt">
<div id="content">
<table class="nav">
<tr>
<td class="back"><a id="top"></a></td>
<td class="top"><a href="index.html" rel="contents">&uarr;&nbsp;Table of Contents&nbsp;&uarr;</a></td>
<td class="next"><a href="s2.5.b.html" rel="next">&sect;2.5.(b)&nbsp;Relevant roles&nbsp;&gt;&gt;</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div class="breadcrumb"><a class="nav" href="s2.html" rel="section">&sect;2&nbsp;Role Binding</a>&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;<a class="nav" href="s2.5.html" rel="section">&sect;2.5&nbsp;Abstract Roles</a></div>
<div class="subsect depth3" id="s2.5.a">
<h4 class="subsect">&sect;2.5.(a)&nbsp;<span class="title">Using abstract classes for creation</span><a class="img" href="s2.5.a.html"
title="PermaLink to (a)&nbsp;Using abstract classes for creation"><img style="vertical-align:text-top;margin-left:5px;" src="../images/permalink.png"
alt="" /></a></h4>
<p>Abstract role classes can indeed be used for object creation.
The effect of such a statement is that the team must be
marked <code>abstract</code>. Only those sub-teams are concrete
that provide concrete versions for all role classes used in
creation expressions.<br />
This includes the case, where a
super-team has a concrete role class and creates
instances of this role class and only the sub-team changes
the status of this role class to abstract. Also here
the sub-team must be marked abstract, because it contains
an abstract role class that is used in creation expressions.
</p>
<div class="note">
<h5>Interpretation:</h5>
Since the type in a role creation expression is late-bound relative to the enclosing team instance, abstract role classes
can be seen
as the hook in a <strong>template&amp;hook pattern</strong> that is raised from the method level to the class level:
A super-team may already refer to the constructor of an abstract role class,
only the sub-team will provide the concrete role class to fill the hook with the necessary implementation.
</div>
</div>
<table class="nav">
<tr>
<td class="back"></td>
<td class="top"><a href="index.html" rel="contents">&uarr;&nbsp;Table of Contents&nbsp;&uarr;</a></td>
<td class="next"><a href="s2.5.b.html" rel="next">&sect;2.5.(b)&nbsp;Relevant roles&nbsp;&gt;&gt;</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div class="breadcrumb"><a class="nav" href="s2.html" rel="section">&sect;2&nbsp;Role Binding</a>&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;<a class="nav" href="s2.5.html" rel="section">&sect;2.5&nbsp;Abstract Roles</a></div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
<hr /><a class="w3c img" href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer"
shape="rect"><img src="../images/valid-css2-blue.png" alt="Valid CSS!" height="31" width="88" /></a><a class="w3c img" href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer" shape="rect"><img src="../images/valid-xhtml10-blue.png" alt="Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict" height="31"
width="88" /></a><address>&copy; Stephan Herrmann, Christine Hundt, Marco Mosconi</address>
OT/J version 1.3 &mdash; last modified: 2011-05-15
</div>
</body>
</html>