examples/org.eclipse.graphiti.doc/resources/docu/gfw/graphiti-introduction.htm - graphiti/org.eclipse.graphiti - Gitiles

 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
 <html>

 <head>
 <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
 <title>Graphics Framework introduction</title>
 <link href="../book.css" rel="Stylesheet" type="text/css">
 <link href="../code.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">

 <style type="text/css">
 .ms-grid5-main {
 	border-left: .75pt solid black;
 	border-right: 1.5pt solid black;
 	border-top: 1.5pt solid black;
 	border-bottom: .75pt solid black;
 	background-color: white;
 }
 .ms-grid5-tl {
 	font-weight: normal;
 	color: black;
 	border-left: .75pt solid black;
 	border-right-style: none;
 	border-top-style: none;
 	border-bottom: 1.5pt solid black;
 	background-color: white;
 }
 .ms-grid5-left {
 	font-weight: normal;
 	color: black;
 	border-left: .75pt solid black;
 	border-right-style: none;
 	border-top-style: none;
 	border-bottom: .75pt solid black;
 	background-color: white;
 }
 .ms-grid5-top {
 	font-weight: normal;
 	color: black;
 	border-left: .75pt solid black;
 	border-right-style: none;
 	border-top-style: none;
 	border-bottom: 1.5pt solid black;
 	background-color: white;
 }
 .ms-grid5-even {
 	font-weight: normal;
 	color: black;
 	border-left: .75pt solid black;
 	border-right-style: none;
 	border-top-style: none;
 	border-bottom: .75pt solid black;
 	background-color: white;
 }
 </style>

 </head>

 <body>

 <h1>Graphiti Introduction</h1>
 <h2>Development of High-Quality Graphical Model Editors</h2>
 <p>Graphiti supports the fast and easy creation of homogeneous graphical editors
 that visualize an underlying Domain Model using a tool-defined graphical
 notation and make editable. We locate Graphiti in the Eclipse Modeling arena and
 distinguish the framework from GMF and GEF. Then, we give an overview of the
 architecture and an introduction into the basic concepts of Graphiti.</p>
 <p>Typical examples are class diagram editors (using the UML notation) or process
 flow editors (using the BPMN notation).</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p><img alt="" height="379" src="visio/class-editor.gif" width="810"></p>
 <p><strong>Figure: Example screenshot of a class diagram editor</strong></p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p><img alt="" height="576" src="visio/process-editor.gif" width="739"></p>
 <p><strong>Figure: Example screenshot of a process flow editor</strong></p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p>If one tries to build a graphical editor for a Domain Model using Eclipse, he
 will soon come across the Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) and the Graphical
 Editing Framework (GEF). While EMF provides the basis for modeling, GEF supports
 programming graphical editors.</p>
 <p>But it is immediately noticeable, that GEF is fairly complex and it needs a
 notable amount of work to get used to the framework. Therefore, and also to
 homogenize their tooling, SAP built a framework that hides GEF&#39;s complexities
 from the developer and bridges EMF and GEF to ease and speed up the development
 of graphical editors.</p>
 <p>After SAP AG decided in 2009 to donate the framework to the eclipse
 community, the development team was able to deliver the 0.7.0 incubation release
 of the Graphical Tooling Infrastructure (Graphiti) in October, 2010 and 0.8.0
 with Indigo in June 2011. We should emphasize that already the SAP-internal
 predecessor of Graphiti was in productive use.</p>
 <p>Graphiti provides the following benefits for development and usage:</p>
 <ul>
 	<li>low entry barrier: platform specific technologies (GEF/Draw2D) are
 	hidden</li>
 	<li>incremental development: fast payoffs by using default implementations,
 	short development cycle (program, debug)</li>
 	<li>homogeneous editors: editors on top of Graphiti look and behave
 	similarly</li>
 	<li>optional support of different platforms: diagrams are defined platform
 	independently, in principle they can be rendered on any platform</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Graphiti is an alternative to the <em>Graphical Modeling Framework (GMF)</em>
 that exists for some time at Eclipse. Basic differences in the paradigms of
 Graphiti and GMF are listed in table below.</p>
 <p>
 &nbsp;</p>


 <table class="ms-grid5-main" style="width: 500" cellspacing="1">
 	<!-- fpstyle: 20,011111100 -->
 	<tr>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-tl" style="width: 20%; height: 19px"></td>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-top" style="width: 40%; height: 19px"><strong>Graphiti</strong></td>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-top" style="width: 40%; height: 19px"><strong>GMF</strong></td>
 	</tr>
 	<tr>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-left" style="width: 20%"><strong>Architecture</strong></td>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">runtime-oriented</td>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">generative</td>
 	</tr>
 	<tr>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-left" style="width: 20%"><strong>Interface</strong></td>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">self-contained</td>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">GEF-dependent</td>
 	</tr>
 	<tr>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-left" style="width: 20%"><strong>Client-Logic</strong></td>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">centralized (feature concept)</td>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">distributed functionality</td>
 	</tr>
 	<tr>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-left" style="width: 20%"><strong>Look &amp; Feel</strong></td>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">standardized, defined by SAP usability experts</td>
 		<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">simple, adaptable in generated code</td>
 	</tr>
 </table>
 <p><strong>Table: Graphiti vs. GMF</strong></p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p>As paramount difference between the architectures of the frameworks we rate
 that GMF follows a generative approach, while in Graphiti one programs against a
 plain old Java interface. Graphiti&#39;s approach has the big advantage, that no
 generated source code must be manipulated to adapt the editor – in contrast to
 GMF where one has to change generated sources, which can cause headaches when
 regenerating. </p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>

 <h2>Architecture</h2>
 <p>Naturally, communication between a user and a Graphiti based tool happens via
 the screen as well as by mouse and keyboard (see figure).&nbsp; An Interaction
 Component will receive requests such as resizing, drag-and-drop, or deleting.
 The actual processing of these requests happens in a so-called <strong>Diagram
 Type Agent</strong>, which will be discussed in the following section in more
 detail.</p>
 <p>It is the objective of the Rendering Engine to display the current data on
 the screen. Rendering Engine and Interaction Component together form the
 framework components of Graphiti - and thus the actual Graphiti runtime. The
 technical realization of the Graphiti runtime is based on the Graphical Editing
 Framework (GEF) in conjunction with Draw2d. Graphiti’s defaults ensure a uniform
 user interface (look and feel) of all Graphiti based tools.</p>
 <h2>Diagram Type Agent </h2>
 <p>As mentioned already above, the Diagram Type Agent is addressed via the
 Interaction Component. This happens over a standardized interface. The Diagram
 Type Agent has to be implemented and made available by the developer. For this
 implementation developers can make use of lots of various services as well as
 many meaningful standard implementations. </p>
 <p>Assistance of the services and standard implementations can support a
 developer to create his own graphical editor really fast. For example, actions
 like move, resize, delete, remove, and print are available immediately. One
 should not regard a first version as a prototype which has to be thrown away
 later. Rather the initial version can be extended to a complete product
 incrementally with increasing Graphiti know-how and rising requirements.</p>
 <p>In other words: In the beginning a developer comes to a functional editor
 very quickly. This editor can be adorned gradually (e.g. color gradients) and
 can be equipped with additional functionality (e.g. direct editing, extension of
 the context menus and context buttons).</p>
 <p>A Diagram Type Agent’s major task is to modify the <em>model data</em>. On
 the one side we have the <em>Pictogram Model</em> (incl. <em>Link Model</em>)
 whose <em>metamodel</em> is made available by Graphiti and on the other side we
 have the <em>domain specific model</em> which comes from the developer. These
 models are explained in the following.</p>
 <h2>Domain Model </h2>
 <p>The Domain Model contains the data which has to be visualized graphically. A
 developer would for example use the Ecore metamodel for a graphical Ecore
 editor. An editor for BPM (Business Process Management) would use the Businesses
 Process Modeling Notation.</p>
 <p>It is of advantage (however not absolutely necessary) if this model is
 available in EMF just like the Pictogram Model. But Graphiti can deal also with
 models outside EMF. In Graphiti, the data of the Domain Models are called
 <strong>Business Objects</strong>.</p>
 <h2>Pictogram Model</h2>
 <p>The Pictogram Model contains the complete information for representing a
 diagram. That implies that each diagram can be represented without the presence
 of the Domain Data. This requires a partially redundant storage of data, which
 is present both in the Pictogram Model and in the Domain Model. Imagine the
 class names in case of an Ecore editor. Since data redundancy always draws the
 problem of the synchronization, Graphiti offers a concept to update this data.
 Data which is out of sync can be visualized graphically and can be corrected
 (semi-) automatically by the use of so-called<strong> Update Features</strong>.
 This approach enables an editing of Domain Data with different tools and a
 subsequent updating of already existing diagrams.</p>
 <p>A detailed discussion of the Pictogram metamodel would blow up the content of
 this article. Further information can be found in the „<em>org.eclipse.graphiti.mm</em>
 “-plugin which contains the metamodel and some diagrams. The diagrams can be
 viewed with the help of the Ecore tooling.</p>
 <p>Th<a name="Hyperlink to tutorial"></a>e tutorial will show where data of the
 Pictogram Model is produced for the graphical representation.</p>
 <h2>Link Model</h2>
 <p>The Link Model is responsible for connecting data from the Domain Model and
 the graphical representation (that is, data from the Pictogram Model). These
 connections are again needed by many actions in the graphical editor. For
 instance, a deletion or a move of a graphical object needs also access to the
 associated object of the Domain Model in order to be able to make the necessary
 changes.</p>
 <h2>Tasks of the Diagram Type Agent </h2>
 <p>The tasks of the Diagram Type Agent can be explained most conveniently on the
 basis of a small example - in this case we use a create operation which is
 initiated by the user through the Interaction Component. The user clicks into
 the tools palette of the graphical editor and draws a rectangle in the diagram
 to indicate size and position of the object to be created. Now the Diagram Type
 Agent does the following:</p>
 <ul>
 	<li>&nbsp;Create a new object in the Domain Model.</li>
 	<li>Create the graphical visualization in the Pictogram Model. E.g., create
 	Graphics Algorithms like a <span class="keyword">RoundedRectangle</span> or
 	a text element. Initialize them with colors and fonts and do the layout.</li>
 	<li>Create the link between<em> Pictogram Model object</em> and<em> Domain
 	Model object</em> (<em>Link Model</em>).</li>
 </ul>
 <h2>The Feature Concept </h2>
 <p>Figure 2 displays the internal structure of the Diagram Type Agent. The
 actors shown there are to be provided by the developer. This means he has to
 implement an amount of so-called Features which are similar to operations. Here
 are some typical examples for Graphiti Features:</p>
 <ul>
 	<li><em>Add Features</em> create the graphical representation of Domain
 	Model elements in the Pictogram Model.</li>
 	<li><em>Create Features</em> produce new objects in the Domain Model as well
 	as the appropriate graphical representations. Here it makes sense to reuse
 	existing <em>Add Features</em>.</li>
 	<li><em>Remove Features</em> delete graphical representations in the
 	Pictogram Model.</li>
 	<li><em>Delete Features</em> delete both, a Domain Model object and its
 	graphical representations, in the Pictogram Model.</li>
 </ul>
 <p>A <strong>Feature Provider</strong> supplies the needed features considering
 the given context. Processing the features leads to the modification of the
 appropriate data specified above.</p>
 <p>Further diagram type specific and tool specific requests to the <strong>
 Interaction Component</strong> are handled by the <strong>Diagram Type Provider</strong>.
 This includes the selection of the appropriate update strategy, that is, the
 decision when synchronizations between Domain and Pictogram Model have to be
 done.</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p>

 </body>

 </html>
	<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
	<html>

	<head>
	<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
	<title>Graphics Framework introduction</title>
	<link href="../book.css" rel="Stylesheet" type="text/css">
	<link href="../code.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">

	<style type="text/css">
	.ms-grid5-main {
	border-left: .75pt solid black;
	border-right: 1.5pt solid black;
	border-top: 1.5pt solid black;
	border-bottom: .75pt solid black;
	background-color: white;
	}
	.ms-grid5-tl {
	font-weight: normal;
	color: black;
	border-left: .75pt solid black;
	border-right-style: none;
	border-top-style: none;
	border-bottom: 1.5pt solid black;
	background-color: white;
	}
	.ms-grid5-left {
	font-weight: normal;
	color: black;
	border-left: .75pt solid black;
	border-right-style: none;
	border-top-style: none;
	border-bottom: .75pt solid black;
	background-color: white;
	}
	.ms-grid5-top {
	font-weight: normal;
	color: black;
	border-left: .75pt solid black;
	border-right-style: none;
	border-top-style: none;
	border-bottom: 1.5pt solid black;
	background-color: white;
	}
	.ms-grid5-even {
	font-weight: normal;
	color: black;
	border-left: .75pt solid black;
	border-right-style: none;
	border-top-style: none;
	border-bottom: .75pt solid black;
	background-color: white;
	}
	</style>

	</head>

	<body>

	<h1>Graphiti Introduction</h1>
	<h2>Development of High-Quality Graphical Model Editors</h2>
	<p>Graphiti supports the fast and easy creation of homogeneous graphical editors
	that visualize an underlying Domain Model using a tool-defined graphical
	notation and make editable. We locate Graphiti in the Eclipse Modeling arena and
	distinguish the framework from GMF and GEF. Then, we give an overview of the
	architecture and an introduction into the basic concepts of Graphiti.</p>
	<p>Typical examples are class diagram editors (using the UML notation) or process
	flow editors (using the BPMN notation).</p>
	<p> </p>
	<p><img alt="" height="379" src="visio/class-editor.gif" width="810"></p>
	<p><strong>Figure: Example screenshot of a class diagram editor</strong></p>
	<p> </p>
	<p> </p>
	<p><img alt="" height="576" src="visio/process-editor.gif" width="739"></p>
	<p><strong>Figure: Example screenshot of a process flow editor</strong></p>
	<p> </p>
	<p>If one tries to build a graphical editor for a Domain Model using Eclipse, he
	will soon come across the Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) and the Graphical
	Editing Framework (GEF). While EMF provides the basis for modeling, GEF supports
	programming graphical editors.</p>
	<p>But it is immediately noticeable, that GEF is fairly complex and it needs a
	notable amount of work to get used to the framework. Therefore, and also to
	homogenize their tooling, SAP built a framework that hides GEF's complexities
	from the developer and bridges EMF and GEF to ease and speed up the development
	of graphical editors.</p>
	<p>After SAP AG decided in 2009 to donate the framework to the eclipse
	community, the development team was able to deliver the 0.7.0 incubation release
	of the Graphical Tooling Infrastructure (Graphiti) in October, 2010 and 0.8.0
	with Indigo in June 2011. We should emphasize that already the SAP-internal
	predecessor of Graphiti was in productive use.</p>
	<p>Graphiti provides the following benefits for development and usage:</p>
	<ul>
	<li>low entry barrier: platform specific technologies (GEF/Draw2D) are
	hidden</li>
	<li>incremental development: fast payoffs by using default implementations,
	short development cycle (program, debug)</li>
	<li>homogeneous editors: editors on top of Graphiti look and behave
	similarly</li>
	<li>optional support of different platforms: diagrams are defined platform
	independently, in principle they can be rendered on any platform</li>
	</ul>
	<p>Graphiti is an alternative to the <em>Graphical Modeling Framework (GMF)</em>
	that exists for some time at Eclipse. Basic differences in the paradigms of
	Graphiti and GMF are listed in table below.</p>
	<p>
	</p>


	<table class="ms-grid5-main" style="width: 500" cellspacing="1">
	<!-- fpstyle: 20,011111100 -->
	<tr>
	<td class="ms-grid5-tl" style="width: 20%; height: 19px"></td>
	<td class="ms-grid5-top" style="width: 40%; height: 19px"><strong>Graphiti</strong></td>
	<td class="ms-grid5-top" style="width: 40%; height: 19px"><strong>GMF</strong></td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
	<td class="ms-grid5-left" style="width: 20%"><strong>Architecture</strong></td>
	<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">runtime-oriented</td>
	<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">generative</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
	<td class="ms-grid5-left" style="width: 20%"><strong>Interface</strong></td>
	<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">self-contained</td>
	<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">GEF-dependent</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
	<td class="ms-grid5-left" style="width: 20%"><strong>Client-Logic</strong></td>
	<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">centralized (feature concept)</td>
	<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">distributed functionality</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
	<td class="ms-grid5-left" style="width: 20%"><strong>Look & Feel</strong></td>
	<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">standardized, defined by SAP usability experts</td>
	<td class="ms-grid5-even" style="width: 40%">simple, adaptable in generated code</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
	<p><strong>Table: Graphiti vs. GMF</strong></p>
	<p> </p>
	<p>As paramount difference between the architectures of the frameworks we rate
	that GMF follows a generative approach, while in Graphiti one programs against a
	plain old Java interface. Graphiti's approach has the big advantage, that no
	generated source code must be manipulated to adapt the editor – in contrast to
	GMF where one has to change generated sources, which can cause headaches when
	regenerating. </p>
	<p> </p>

	<h2>Architecture</h2>
	<p>Naturally, communication between a user and a Graphiti based tool happens via
	the screen as well as by mouse and keyboard (see figure).  An Interaction
	Component will receive requests such as resizing, drag-and-drop, or deleting.
	The actual processing of these requests happens in a so-called <strong>Diagram
	Type Agent</strong>, which will be discussed in the following section in more
	detail.</p>
	<p>It is the objective of the Rendering Engine to display the current data on
	the screen. Rendering Engine and Interaction Component together form the
	framework components of Graphiti - and thus the actual Graphiti runtime. The
	technical realization of the Graphiti runtime is based on the Graphical Editing
	Framework (GEF) in conjunction with Draw2d. Graphiti’s defaults ensure a uniform
	user interface (look and feel) of all Graphiti based tools.</p>
	<h2>Diagram Type Agent </h2>
	<p>As mentioned already above, the Diagram Type Agent is addressed via the
	Interaction Component. This happens over a standardized interface. The Diagram
	Type Agent has to be implemented and made available by the developer. For this
	implementation developers can make use of lots of various services as well as
	many meaningful standard implementations. </p>
	<p>Assistance of the services and standard implementations can support a
	developer to create his own graphical editor really fast. For example, actions
	like move, resize, delete, remove, and print are available immediately. One
	should not regard a first version as a prototype which has to be thrown away
	later. Rather the initial version can be extended to a complete product
	incrementally with increasing Graphiti know-how and rising requirements.</p>
	<p>In other words: In the beginning a developer comes to a functional editor
	very quickly. This editor can be adorned gradually (e.g. color gradients) and
	can be equipped with additional functionality (e.g. direct editing, extension of
	the context menus and context buttons).</p>
	<p>A Diagram Type Agent’s major task is to modify the <em>model data</em>. On
	the one side we have the <em>Pictogram Model</em> (incl. <em>Link Model</em>)
	whose <em>metamodel</em> is made available by Graphiti and on the other side we
	have the <em>domain specific model</em> which comes from the developer. These
	models are explained in the following.</p>
	<h2>Domain Model </h2>
	<p>The Domain Model contains the data which has to be visualized graphically. A
	developer would for example use the Ecore metamodel for a graphical Ecore
	editor. An editor for BPM (Business Process Management) would use the Businesses
	Process Modeling Notation.</p>
	<p>It is of advantage (however not absolutely necessary) if this model is
	available in EMF just like the Pictogram Model. But Graphiti can deal also with
	models outside EMF. In Graphiti, the data of the Domain Models are called
	<strong>Business Objects</strong>.</p>
	<h2>Pictogram Model</h2>
	<p>The Pictogram Model contains the complete information for representing a
	diagram. That implies that each diagram can be represented without the presence
	of the Domain Data. This requires a partially redundant storage of data, which
	is present both in the Pictogram Model and in the Domain Model. Imagine the
	class names in case of an Ecore editor. Since data redundancy always draws the
	problem of the synchronization, Graphiti offers a concept to update this data.
	Data which is out of sync can be visualized graphically and can be corrected
	(semi-) automatically by the use of so-called<strong> Update Features</strong>.
	This approach enables an editing of Domain Data with different tools and a
	subsequent updating of already existing diagrams.</p>
	<p>A detailed discussion of the Pictogram metamodel would blow up the content of
	this article. Further information can be found in the „<em>org.eclipse.graphiti.mm</em>
	“-plugin which contains the metamodel and some diagrams. The diagrams can be
	viewed with the help of the Ecore tooling.</p>
	<p>Th<a name="Hyperlink to tutorial"></a>e tutorial will show where data of the
	Pictogram Model is produced for the graphical representation.</p>
	<h2>Link Model</h2>
	<p>The Link Model is responsible for connecting data from the Domain Model and
	the graphical representation (that is, data from the Pictogram Model). These
	connections are again needed by many actions in the graphical editor. For
	instance, a deletion or a move of a graphical object needs also access to the
	associated object of the Domain Model in order to be able to make the necessary
	changes.</p>
	<h2>Tasks of the Diagram Type Agent </h2>
	<p>The tasks of the Diagram Type Agent can be explained most conveniently on the
	basis of a small example - in this case we use a create operation which is
	initiated by the user through the Interaction Component. The user clicks into
	the tools palette of the graphical editor and draws a rectangle in the diagram
	to indicate size and position of the object to be created. Now the Diagram Type
	Agent does the following:</p>
	<ul>
	<li> Create a new object in the Domain Model.</li>
	<li>Create the graphical visualization in the Pictogram Model. E.g., create
	Graphics Algorithms like a <span class="keyword">RoundedRectangle</span> or
	a text element. Initialize them with colors and fonts and do the layout.</li>
	<li>Create the link between<em> Pictogram Model object</em> and<em> Domain
	Model object</em> (<em>Link Model</em>).</li>
	</ul>
	<h2>The Feature Concept </h2>
	<p>Figure 2 displays the internal structure of the Diagram Type Agent. The
	actors shown there are to be provided by the developer. This means he has to
	implement an amount of so-called Features which are similar to operations. Here
	are some typical examples for Graphiti Features:</p>
	<ul>
	<li><em>Add Features</em> create the graphical representation of Domain
	Model elements in the Pictogram Model.</li>
	<li><em>Create Features</em> produce new objects in the Domain Model as well
	as the appropriate graphical representations. Here it makes sense to reuse
	existing <em>Add Features</em>.</li>
	<li><em>Remove Features</em> delete graphical representations in the
	Pictogram Model.</li>
	<li><em>Delete Features</em> delete both, a Domain Model object and its
	graphical representations, in the Pictogram Model.</li>
	</ul>
	<p>A <strong>Feature Provider</strong> supplies the needed features considering
	the given context. Processing the features leads to the modification of the
	appropriate data specified above.</p>
	<p>Further diagram type specific and tool specific requests to the <strong>
	Interaction Component</strong> are handled by the <strong>Diagram Type Provider</strong>.
	This includes the selection of the appropriate update strategy, that is, the
	decision when synchronizations between Domain and Pictogram Model have to be
	done.</p>
	<p> </p>
	<p> </p>
	<p> </p>
	<p> </p>
	<p> </p>
	<p> </p>
	<p> </p>
	<p> </p>

	</body>

	</html>