[228954] - changed field layout to GRID because it looks much nicer. Cannot reproduced concernes from previous fix when it was changed to FLAT

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/build/org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/managedbuilder/ui/properties/AbstractToolSettingUI.java b/build/org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/managedbuilder/ui/properties/AbstractToolSettingUI.java
index c15d1a938fa..94b9e331289 100644
--- a/build/org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/managedbuilder/ui/properties/AbstractToolSettingUI.java
+++ b/build/org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/managedbuilder/ui/properties/AbstractToolSettingUI.java
@@ -27,14 +27,7 @@ public abstract class AbstractToolSettingUI extends FieldEditorPreferencePage {
 	 * @param style
 	 */
 	protected AbstractToolSettingUI(IResourceInfo info) {
- 		// fix for PR 63973
- 		// If we use a grid layout then widgets that should be layed out horizontally,
- 		// e.g. StringButtonFieldEditor, will have their component widgets
- 		// arranged vertically.  This looks terrible when you have for instance
- 		// a StringButtonFieldEditor, which has a label, an edit box, and a "modify" button
- 		// to the right because all three will be stacked vertically.
- 		super(FLAT);
- 		// end fix for 63973
+ 		super(GRID);
 		noDefaultAndApplyButton();
 		fInfo = info;
 	}